🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.